broken

here there is no music
only poetry
and steel

Spare me

O spare me the tiredness
of wisdom
of the wisdom
of knowing better
of the wisdom of knowing better than
to dream
impossible dreams.

Spare me the serenity
of the adult I became
when I outgrew
the folly
of spring.

And spare me the sanity
that traps my pain and hope
in a grey web of calm
beside stone tears
I do not shed
anguish
I do not feel
and need
I’ve rocked to sleep.

And you,
yearning
– it began with you.
Where are you now?

powder

Nothing smashes the dream
of icecream castles in the air
quite like
the grinding boot
of reality.

Cesar Chavez

US release 2014

Directed by Diego Luna

Written by Keir Pearson

Australian release date to be announced (but there it was, on a Qantas flight!)

The US 1936 National Labor Relations Act recognized the rights of workers in the US to organise and collectively bargain – but excluded farm workers.

This film tells the story of the heroic struggle of farm workers and their leader Cesar Chavez for their rights to organise and for a dignified living.

Cesar Chavez, born to a farming family in Arizona, moved with them to California when the family lost their farm during the Great Depression. He became a farm worker there at the age of 11, at a time when mass unemployment gave the farm owners immense power and workers, bugger all.

He wanted to change all this and joined the Community Service Organization, where he learned the principles of community organising. By 1962, when Chavez returned from the city to Delano in central California, farm workers were subjected to precarious employment as day labourers with no minimum wage (paid as little as $2 a day). Workers from different ethnic groups were pitted against each other and decent working conditions (like toilet facilities in the fields) were denied.

The film – not a documentary, but an artistic representation of the struggle and the people involved – portrays the arduous and dangerous work of organising within the community during the 1960s and 70s. It depicts the solidarity developed in the course of the struggle, the violence of the bosses and the state, the farm owners’ racism and the toll of their many sacrifices on Cesar and his family.

It also explores the many tactics employed by the United Farm Workers, as Chavez (played by Michael Peña) first makes contact with Mexican workers willing to organise, then along with his wife Helen (America Ferrera) and other comrades, take up work in the fields alongside them. The newly formed union, co-founded by Dolores Huerta (Rosario Dawson) establishes a credit union to make links with more workers, and distributes literature to explain to workers their rights (using cartoons because of the high rate of illiteracy).

As the bosses cut the wages of Filipino workers in 1965, the new union is called on for solidarity. A strike wave spreads throughout the region. Linked to the strike is a boycott campaign that the union spreads first across the state and then throughout the US. It features an epic 300 mile march from Delano to Sacramento to put the spotlight on the mistreatment of farm workers. As grape growers and wine makers feet the boycott pinch but remain intransigent, and newly inaugurated president Richard Nixon facilitates grape export to Europe and promises the military will purchase the excess, the union seeks and finds the solidarity of a consumer boycott and union bans in the UK.

What stands out in the film is the union leadership’s clear approach to self-organisation of the workers, hand-in-hand with outreach – to other workers and unionists, consumers, religious communities, students, civil rights groups – for support on the basis of justice and human rights.

A contradiction of the times that is treated in the film is the intersection of sexist attitudes and militant antiracist working class solidarity. It is exemplified in Chavez’ insistence his wife Helen not risk arrest – after declaring his willingness to do so himself – asking “who’ll look after the kids?” She stands up to him with the same determination she then displays in leading resistance to a court injunction prohibiting the use of the word “huelga” (Spanish for strike) in the vicinity of the farms. As she is arrested and led away, others take up the call.

This is further explored in the exploration of violence in the struggle, which at least in part is portrayed as a manifesto of machismo. Chavez’ commitment to non-violence is also portrayed as derived from his Catholic convictions. Other protagonists point to the importance of not being portrayed as crazy Mexicans in order to retain public support. A remarkable episode the film recounts from the 5-year strike and boycott movement is Cesar’s 25-day fast, directed toward the strike movement itself. He begins the fast in response to an act of retaliation to strike-breakers’ violence on the picket line. It is both a call to the movement to unite in renouncing violence and a demonstration of his commitment to pursue the strike and maintain non-violence.

Despite the violence of the farm owners and support from local, state and federal authorities, the crippling boycott and strike forces the growers to capitulate. They sign an agreement with the union in 1970, and after a further five years, the workers had win passage of legislation recognising farm workers’ right to organise.

“Cesar Chavez” is still highly relevant today, at a time when undocumented workers have been deported by the Obama administration in record numbers, and when the struggle for a $15/hour minimum wage is being fought by underpaid workers across the US. The film joins the rich heritage of those like Matewan and Made in Dagenham that successfully keep alive the knowledge of working class history and that by so doing, dare us to struggle and win.

Say no to Islamophobia, war and attacks on our civil liberties!

A speech I gave at a rally in Perth, 18th October 2014.

Since the theatrical police raids on the homes of Muslims in September 2014, in the name of security/fighting terrorism, Australia has witnessed a tide of religious bigotry directed at Muslims. This rally, with about 200 people participating, was a public demonstration of opposition to Islamophobia, the government's war drive and attacks on civil liberties, and the use of the terror hysteria to distract community attention from the government's unpopular austerity budget.